Fixed issue with Android O where the app would crash when certain other O apps were installed that used adaptive icons.Fixed issue where in the notification picker a sound wouldn't stop.Fixed issue with sounds sometimes cutting off or stopping after a while.A new one of these will have way more bells and whistles than that 1992 Toyota. Toyota Tacoma and coming back in the fall is 3. Considering your questioning of their availablity, I'd wager you mean something smaller than a "full-size" 1/2 ton truck. I'm not sure what you mean by a light duty pickup.
I don't need a computer to tell me how to drive. I am in a vehicle to move myself and optionally some other materials from point A to point B. Okay, I know, I have a huge lawn that people keep walking on, but really, why is there NOBODY that sells basic vehicles that aren't loaded with all sorts of "safety features" that simply provide a safer way to do unsafe things while you drive? Hell, you can't even buy a light-duty pickup anymore (though they might still classify them as such). I don't have high hopes for answers to these sorts of questions. Of course, it is much harder to figure out if, long term, this was a good policy - would the economy have been better off to "kill off" the sick or better off in "healing" the sick? Have any of the "sick" been healed or are they still "sick"? Have we ensured similar things don't happen in the future? " so overall, it doesn't look like all the TARP funds were such a bad investment even from a straight purchase-sale calculation. The question is would letting GM go bankrupt have resulted in more than 10 billion in losses in terms of lost payroll taxes and increased social assistance benefits for all of the GM workers and all of the assorted companies that also would have gone under?įurther down in the linked article is "On all TARP investments to date, including the sale of Treasury’s shares in AIG, the government has recovered a total of $432.7 billion on $421.8 billion disbursed. This idea is yet another example of it for all of the reasons you list and more. GM management was incompetent to the core. In addition, the taxpayer still had to eat a $10 billion loss. Given all that we know about GM, can someone explain (aside from the obvious political reasons / TBTF), why this company was bailed out? Romney was correct, it should have been allowed to go bankrupt. That hotspot is on any time the car is on.'" Why wouldn't someone just use a smartphone with a data plan, or a dedicated hotspot device? GM thinks they'll be drawn to 'a powerful antenna that's stronger than that of a smartphone, along with a Wi-Fi hotspot that operates without draining a mobile device's battery. Probably a more likely option for the occasional road trip, though, is $5 per day service (no OnStar requirement) for 250MB of data.
But not all internet service is created equal would you pay $5 for a month of in-car internet service if it meant a 200-meg cap, which is (only) 'enough to stream more than 6.5 hours of music?' That's where a new dedicated Internet service from GM starts ( also at the WSJ, paywalled), and it's $10 for drivers who aren't also OnStar subscribers. An anonymous reader writes "$5 doesn't sound like much for a day of internet service in some contexts: it's less than you might pay for it in-flight, and less than a few espresso drinks if you're lured in by a coffee shop's Wi-Fi service.